While we have seen many steps taken forward by the transgender population in securing basic human rights of equality, we are still many years behind the movement of the gay rights movement. While much of this variance can be directly attributable to the fact that the gay rights movement has had many more years, and decades of traction, there is something else at work here that makes it more difficult for the transgender equality movement to ever find that same level of tractive momentum.
I believe change is going
to come even more slowly for the transgender populace than it will for
the gay and lesbian rights movement. We will get there... but the
movement will be slower in achieving it's ultimate culmination as has
occurred with greater rapidity within the GLB sphere. Much of this, I
attribute to several factors...
The GLB realm has achieved many of their goals and has been able to
permeate the media channels ahead of our movement. Their capabilities,
holding positions within the media, allow them to integrate with the
variety of networks to provide traction for such shows. Unfortunately, the quality of the shows representing transgender individuals has been predominantly skewed and we are still the target of jocularity at our expense. Usually, the depiction of a crudely dressed male in a dress serves to substantiate these images (we almost never ever see the reverse nor jokes of the oddly dressed woman in men's clothing...that's just not deemed "funny"). Some of the independent media channels are starting to change that image but it is slow going and still not inherent within mainstream media channels.
The GLB realm is more greatly understood then the transgender realm.
The main impetus of this statement is as associable to the fact that most
people can understand outward manifestations and actions within the gay populace more clearly
then they can inward and non-tangible assertions of the identity which
transgender people claim for their own. To put this more simply, people
can understand "gay" because they simply see and can easily identity
the tangible aspects that a gay person wants to BE with a
another person of the same sex. With a transgender person, there is
only the ASSERTION made by the individual that their identity is that of
the "opposite sex" as is generally cited. There is less tangibility to
the concept within the cis-gender world and, as we all know, if we
can't see the world is round, then we have no tangibility as a human
race, to ascertain that it is anything but flat.
Much of the GLB realm and others within the media are allowing for the
portrayal of transgender individuals as fringe tag-alongs to the GLB
community and depicting our lives as such within the mainstream media. I covered this as a sub-part to item (1) but feel it needs its own bullet item number....and further discussion.
...And here is the BIG one....
Teaching others through education rarely works. Trying to sit on a
show and explain our lives goes over most people's heads. No one likes
to be lectured rhetoric as to why we are who we are.....and why we should
deserve the respect and privacy yielded to others. Those that are
different but for which (unlike the Gay and Lesbian population) there is
no tangible ability to understand will always question and probe. It
is rude, but it appears to be human nature. I can cite many examples in
ordinary cis-gendered life where this happens if you like.
of the most effective strategies I can see in furthering the
transgender movement would be NOT so much through just active education
and legislation (although it is an inseparable and intrinsic part of
maintaining the forward momentum of our rights movement) but also to
consider that those who come to accept us most learn
to find us first as people the same as they are. In other words,
education through passive learning associated with familiarization.
This means, again in plain English, that people who get to know you as a
person come to realize that you are the same as any other person. They
may NEVER understand why we are who we are BUT they will find
compassion to our needs and our rights simply because they will have a
connective association with us as HUMAN BEINGS.
are a couple of TED talks on passive learning as being FAR more
effective than trying to stuff human rights and what is seen as a
personal agenda down others throats. Acceptance comes with
understanding. Understanding comes with familiarization. Those who do
not wish to associate or familiarize themselves with us will find
themselves slowly pushed into a corner - not by the actions of what we
have done, but by the actions of others around us, who come to accept us
for who we are and who THEY themselves push into the sidelines.
Familiarization also allows through associative acceptance. Example
have seen this happen on many occasions. One of the local pubs I visit
has a local clientele who, when they saw me the first time, were very,
very nervous of who or "what" just walked into their bar. Over the
course of familiarization in the ensuing 3 years, they have come to know
me as a person and would (and have said this on multiple occasions)
stand up for me if there were any problems that might ever arise. Those
who were stand-off-ish now give me warm hugs and I am actively sought out each week as a vital part of the clan we now are.
also creates associative connectivity. If John knows Christen and John
is OK with knowing this trans person, and I know John, then if John
likes her, then perhaps I can get to know Christen and come to like her.
are more reasons.... I could write a book about all of this given the
people I have interacted with (especially with respect to item (2).
stop here for now.... there is a lot to be said for both active
education and legislation AND for passive integration through immersion.
If we can make inroads into the main communities through such
familiarization campaigns, then we have a better chance of furthering
our movements forward as people get to know us and come to realize that
we are just like anyone else....